9 research outputs found
Antiarrhythmic agents
Iako danas postoje i druge metode lijeÄenja aritmija (kateterska ablacija, elektrostimulacija srca i sl.), antiaritmici su i dalje najÄeÅ”Äe upotrebljavana terapija u prevenciji i lijeÄenju nepravilnog ritma srca. Kako bi uspjeh lijeÄenja aritmija bio Å”to veÄi, nužno je poznavati naÄin na koji antiaritmici modificiraju i iniciraju provoÄenje impulsa kroz srce, kao i odrediti omjer koristi i rizika za svakog bolesnika posebno. Osobito je važno imati na umu nuspojave, proaritmogeno djelovanje i interakcije antiaritmika s drugim lijekovima.Although there are other methods of treating arrhythmias (catheter ablation, heart electro stimulation etc.), antiarrhythmic agents are used most often in the prevention and treatment of irregular heart rhythms. To ensure efficient treatment of arrhythmias, it is necessary to know the way antiarrhythmic agents modify and initiate cardiac impulse conduction, as it is to determine the risk-benefit ratio for each patient. It is particularly important to be aware of side effects, proarrhythmogenic effects and the interaction of antiarrhythmic agents with other medicaments
Drugs in Pregnancy
Na podruÄju kliniÄke farmakologije trudnoÄe
vrlo je malo pravih, kontroliranih kliniÄko-farmakoloÅ”kih
istraživanja zbog etiÄkih razloga. BuduÄi da potroÅ”nja lijekova
u trudnoÄi raste, racionalna farmakoterapija nameÄe se kao
imperativ. VeÄina lijekova može proÄi kroz placentu uz
moguÄnost farmakoloÅ”kog i teratogenog uÄinka na embrio i
fetus. Uzrok malformacija nepoznat je u 70% sluÄajeva, a
lijekovi, kemikalije i zraÄenje Äine 2% uzroka. Danas je poznato
manje od 30 teratogena. Lijekovi mogu djelovati Ŕtetno
na plod u bilo kojem razdoblju trudnoÄe. BuduÄi da je Äak
50% trudnoÄa neplanirano, tu je Äinjenicu važno imati na umu
prilikom propisivanja lijekova ženama generativne dobi. Pri
izboru lijeka treba se odluÄiti za lijekove koji su do sada
Äesto propisivani u trudnoÄi i za koje se pokazalo da su
neŔkodljivi. Takvim lijekovima treba dati prednost pred novim
ili neispitanim lijekovima, a uvijek treba primijeniti najnižu
djelotvornu dozu. Trudnice treba upozoriti da ne uzimaju
lijekove bez recepta i bez prethodnog dogovora s lijeÄnikom.
LijeÄnici i trudnice mogu zatražiti konzultaciju kliniÄkog farmakologa
o uzimanju lijekova u trudnoÄi. NeobiÄno je važno
da se trudnicama objasni tzv. normalna uÄestalost malformacija
u trudnoÄi koja iznosi oko 3% te rizik povezan sa
samom boleÅ”Äu, kako bi se izbjegao nepotreban pobaÄaj ili
nelijeÄenje bolesti trudnice.As it is not ethical for pregnant women to be
included in clinical trials there are very few controlled clinical
trials with pregnant women. The fact is that drug consumption
in pregnancy continuously rises, so rational pharmacotherapy
becomes an imperative. Majority of drugs pass the placental
barrier, carrying potential pharmacological and/or teratogenic
activity on embryo and fetus. In 70% of fetal malformations
causative factor remains unknown while drugs, various chemicals
and radiation make just 2% of causes. Generally, in
everyday use are less than 30 drugs with absolutely proved
teratogenic activity. Drugs can harm a fetus in any period of
pregnancy. About 50% of pregnancies are not planned and
that information is very important when prescribing drugs to
the women in generative phase. Drugs which have been widely
prescribed and which have been shown to be safe in pregnancy
should be a first line in prescribing to pregnant women.
Those drugs should, certainly have an advantage in comparison
to the new drugs with incompletely defined safety profile.
It is also recommended to use the lowest efficient dose. Pregnant
women should be warned to contact their physician any
time when they need some drug, despite if the drug is on the
OTC regimen. If dilemma regarding the use of certain drugs in
pregnancy exists physicians and pregnant women should contact
a clinical pharmacologist. Finally, to avoid unnecessary
abortions or lack of adequate treatment, pregnant women
should be informed on, so called, normal frequency of malformations
which is about 3%, and on risk associated with the
disease as well
Oxycodone: a strong opioid in the treatment of patients with arthritis
Smanjenje boli je vrlo važan dio lijeÄenja reumatoloÅ”kih bolesnika. Peroralni proizvodi s kontroliranim otpuÅ”tanjem omoguÄuju bolesnicima bolju kontrolu boli zbog pogodnijeg doziranja i održane koncentracije u krvi. U studijama je dokazano da je jaki opioid, oksikodon uÄinkovit u smanjenju umjerene do jake perzistirajuÄe boli u bolesnika s degenerativnim i upalnim reumatskim bolestima. Osim znaÄajne kontrole boli i bolje fiziÄke funkcije, oksikodon s kontroliranim otpuÅ”tanjem je poboljÅ”ao podnoÅ”enje boli u bolesnika s osteoartritisom.Reducing pain is a major goal in treating patients with arthritis. Oral controlled-release opioid products enable patients to better maintain pain control due to convenient dosing intervals and sustained blood concentration. Oxycodone is a strong opioid that has proved to be efficacious in analgesic studies of persistent moderate to severe pain in patients with degenerative and inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Beyond significant pain control and better physical function, controlled-release oxycodone improved coping with pain in patients with osteoarthritis
Use of gastroprotective agents in recommended doses in hospitalized patients receiving NSAIDs: a drug utilization study
OBJECTIVE: In recent years, studies investigated to what extend recommendations for co-prescribing gastroprotective agents in prevention of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications are followed in clinical practice. However, only a few studies have also taken into consideration the recommended dose of gastroprotectives prescribed in NSAID-induced ulcer prophylaxis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of concomitant use of gastroprotectives with NSAIDs in hospitalized patients, with emphasis on the recommended dose of gastroprotectives for ulcer prophylaxis. - - - - - METHOD: This observational, cross-sectional, drug utilization study included all adult patients receiving NSAIDs hospitalized in the Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb on the day of the study. Data on age, sex, comorbidities, indications for NSAID use, type/dose of NSAIDs and gastroprotectives, history of gastrointestinal events, active gastrointestinal symptoms and risk factors were evaluated. - - - - - MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Study outcomes were: (1) prevalence of prescription of gastroprotectives among NSAID-users at risk; (2) prevalence of prescription of gastroprotective in recommended dose; (3) association between risk factors and prescription of GPAs. - - - - - RESULTS: The rates of gastroprotectives prescription were significantly higher in NSAID-users with concomitant risk factors as compared to patients without risk factors [47/70 (67.1%) and 8/22 (36.4%), respectively; p = 0.01072]. However, gastroprotection in recommended ulcer-preventive dose was low in both groups [8/70 (11.4%) and 9/92 (9.8%), respectively]. The number of concomitant risk factors did not increase the odds of receiving anti-ulcer therapy (odds ratio 0.7279). Thirty-three percent of patients with concomitant risk factors were not prescribed gastroprotectives. Ibuprofen, NSAID with the lowest risk of inducing gastrointestinal complications, was prescribed in only two patients. - - - - - CONCLUSION: The results indicate high awareness among hospital physicians about possible NSAID-induced gastrointestinal complications, but insufficient knowledge about risk factors related to NSAID-induced gastrointestinal toxicity, recommended dose of gastroprotectives in NSAID-induced ulcer prophylaxis and gastrointestinal toxicity of different types of NSAIDs
The Association of Uric Acid with Glucose and Lipids in General Population: Croatian Cross-Sectional Study
Hyperuricemia may have an important role in metabolic syndrome, cardiovascular diseases and stroke. Elevated serum
uric acid concentration has been shown to be the strong predictor of cardiovascular mortality in several recently
published studies. Our aim was to determine the prevalence of hyperuricemia in general Croatian population and to investigate
the association of serum uric acid with glucose and lipids. This was a retrospective cross-sectional study on
6,476 consecutive adults. Prevalence of hyperuricemia was 13.9% in general population and it was significantly higher
in males, than in females (26% vs. 6%; p<0.001). Median uric acid concentration was higher in males than in females
(343 vs. 238 mmol/L; p<0.001). Age, glucose and lipid parameters did not correlate with uric acid. In hyperuricemic subjects,
increased concentrations of glucose (33.1% vs. 13.1%; p<0.001), triglycerides (46.9% vs. 17.6%; p<0.001), total cholesterol
(69.6% vs. 51.9%; p<0.001), LDL-cholesterol (64.5% vs. 46.4%; p<0.001) and decreased concentration of HDL-
-cholesterol (24.3% vs. 13.0%; p<0.001) were more prevalent than in subjects with normal serum concentrations of uric
acid. Hyperuricemia is highly prevalent in Croatian general population and it aggregates with hyperglycemia and dyslipidemia
UÄinci simvastatina i fenofibrata na malondialdehid i reducirani glutation u plazmi, jetri i mozgu normolipidemiÄnih i hiperlipidemiÄnih Å”takora
The objective of study was to investigate the effects of different doses of simvastatin and fenofibrate on malondialdehyde (MDA) and reduced glutathione (GSH) in the plasma, liver, and brain tissue of male normolipidaemic and hyperlipidaemic rats. Normolipidaemic (Wistar) rats were receiving 10 or 50 mg/kg a day of simvastatin or 30 or 50 mg/kg a day of fenofibrate. Hyperlipidaemic (Zucker) rats were receiving 50 mg/kg/day of simvastatin or 30 mg/kg/day of fenofibrate. Control normolipidaemic and hyperlipidaemic rats were receiving saline. Simvastatin, fenofibrate, and saline were administered by gavage for three weeks. In normolipidaemic rats simvastatin and fenofibrate showed similar and dose-independent effects on plasma and brain MDA and GSH concentrations. Generally, plasma and brain MDA decreased, while brain GSH concentration increased. In hyperlipidaemic rats simvastatin did not affect plasma and brain MDA and GSH concentrations but significantly decreased liver GSH. Fenofibrate decreased plasma and liver MDA but increased brain MDA. In both rat strains fenofibrate significantly decreased liver GSH concentrations, most likely because fenofibrate metabolites bind to GSH. Our findings suggest that simvastatin acts as an antioxidant only in normolipidaemic rats, whereas fenofibrate acts as an antioxidant in both rat strains.Cilj ovog istraživanja bio je istražiti uÄinke razliÄitih doza simvastatina i fenofibrata na malondialdehid (MDA) i reducirani glutation (GSH) u plazmi, jetri i mozgu mužjaka normolipidemiÄnih (Wistar) i hiperlipidemiÄnih (Zucker) Å”takora. Na prvim dvjema eksperimentalnim skupinama normolipidemiÄnih Å”takora simvastatin je primijenjen u dozama 10 ili 50 mg/kg dnevno, a fenofibrat na treÄoj i Äetvrtoj skupini u dozama od 30 i 50 mg/kg/dan. Prva eksperimentalna skupina hiperlipidemiÄnih Å”takora primala je simvastatin 50 mg/kg/dan, a druga fenofibrat 30 mg/kg/dan. Kontrolne skupine normolipidemiÄnih i hiperlipidemiÄnih Å”takora primale su fizioloÅ”ku otopinu. Simvastatin, fenofibrat i fizioloÅ”ka otopina primjenjivani su oralno tijekom tri tjedna. U plazmi i mozgu normolipidemiÄnih Å”takora simvastatin I fenofibrat pokazali su sliÄne i o dozi neovisne uÄinke na koncentracije MDA i GSH. OpÄenito, MDA je bio smanjen, a koncentracija GSH bila je poveÄana. U hiperlipidemiÄnih Å”takora simvastatin nije utjecao na koncentraciju MDA i GSH, ali je prouzroÄio znaÄajno smanjenje GSH u jetri. Fenofibrat je smanjio MDA u plazmi i jetri te poveÄao MDA u mozgu. U oba soja Å”takora fenofibrat je znaÄajno smanjio koncentraciju GSH u jetri, vjerojatno zbog konjugacije GSH s nekim metabolitima fenofibrata. Prema naÅ”im rezultatima, simvastatin djeluje antioksidacijski samo u normolipidemiÄnih Å”takora, a antioksidacijski uÄinak fenofibrata prisutan je u oba soja
UÄinci simvastatina i fenofibrata na aktivnost butirilkolinesteraze u mozgu, plazmi i jetri normolipidemiÄnih i hiperlipidemiÄnih Å”takora
The study objective was to test the hypothesis that simvastatin and fenofibrate should cause an increase in butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) activity not only in the plasma and liver but also in the brain of normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic rats. Catalytic enzyme activity was measured using acetylthiocholine (ATCh) and butyrylthiocholine (BTCh) as substrates. Normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic rats were divided in four groups receiving 50 mg/kg of simvastatin a day or 30 mg/kg of fenofibrate a day for three weeks and three control groups receiving saline. Simvastatin and fenofibrate caused an increase in brain BuChE activity in both normo- and hyperlipidemic rats regardless of the substrate. The increase with BTCh as substrate was significant and practically the same in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic rats after simvastatin treatment (14ā17% vs controls). Simvastatin and fenofibrate also increased liver and plasma BuChE activity in both normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic rats regardless of the substrate. In most cases the increase was significant. Considering the important role of BuChE in cholinergic transmission as well as its pharmacological function, it is necessary to continue investigations of the effects of lipid-lowering drugs on BuChE activity.Cilj ispitivanja bio je u normolipidemiÄnih i hiperlipidemiÄnih Å”takora potvrditi pretpostavku da simvastatin (SIMV) I fenofibrat (FENO) ne uzrokuju samo poveÄanje aktivnosti butirilkolinesteraze (BuChE) u plazmi i jetri nego i poveÄavaju aktivnosti BuChE u mozgu. KatalitiÄka aktivnost enzima mjerena je upotrebom acetiltiokolina (ATCh) i butiriltiokolina (BTCh) kao supstrata. NormolipidemiÄni i hiperlipidemiÄni Å”takori rasporeÄeni su u eksperimentalne skupine, koje su tri tjedna primale SIMV 50 mg/kg na dan ili FENO 30 mg/kg na dan, dok su kontrolne skupine primale fizioloÅ”ku otopinu. I SIMV i FENO uglavnom su izazvali poveÄanje aktivnosti BuChE u mozgu obaju sojeva Å”takora bez obzira na koriÅ”teni supstrat. Aktivnosti BuChE mjerene BTCh kao supstratom bile su znaÄajno veÄe u odnosu na kontrolne vrijednosti u mozgu normolipidemiÄih Å”takora nakon primjene SIMV te u mozgu hiperlipidemiÄnih Å”takora nakon primjene obaju agensa (14ā17%, p<0,001). PoveÄanje aktivnosti BuChE u plazmi i jetri nakon primjene SIMV i FENO izmjeren je u oba soja Å”takora bez obzira na to je li koriÅ”ten ACTh ili BTCh. U veÄini sluÄajeva poveÄanje aktivnosti BuChE u plazmi i jetri bilo je znaÄajno. S obzirom na važnu ulogu BuChE u kolinergiÄnom prijenosu te na njezinu farmakoloÅ”ku funkciju,
potrebno je nastaviti istraživanja utjecaja antilipidnih lijekova na aktivnost BuChE
Antibiotic Use Optimization Program in the Largest Croatian University Hospital ā Benefits of Restrictions on Unlimited Antibiotic Use
The aim of this study was to obtain the relevant information on antibiotic use in a 750-bed Croatian university hospital.
The study has been designed as a 2-point prevalence interventional analysis. For each patient on antibiotic therapy,
diagnosis, indication for treatment, antibiotic therapy, dosage and route of administration together with the results of
microbiological studies (if available) were obtained. After the first prevalence analysis in 2001, a restriction on unlimited
antibiotic use was introduced. The second analysis, performed in 2002, after restrictions on antibiotic use, revealed reductions
in the rates of restricted release antibiotics and overall antibiotic use with decreases from 38.6% to 36.9% and
23.4% to 23.2% respectively (p=0.87). The first survey showed that the 5 most often prescribed antibiotics in the therapy
of bacterial infections were: gentamicin, other aminoglycosides, carbapenems, amoxycillin+clavulanate and vancomycin
with proportions of 14.8%, 10.3%, 8.2%, 7% and 7% respectively. In the year 2002, the most prescribed antimicrobial
drugs in the therapy of bacterial infections were: gentamicin, quinolones, vancomycin, carbapenems and cefuroxime with
proportions of 18.6%, 11.4%, 9.7%, 9.3% and 8% respectively. A reduction in the proportions of doubtful antibiotic therapy,
from 24.6% before the intervention, to 24.2% after the restrictions, accompanied by a 0.4% rise in the rates of indicated
antibiotic therapy was also observed (p=0.93). Our study shows that restrictions on formerly unlimited use of
antimicrobials, even when leading to an improvement in their prescribing, do not necessarily cause rapid and significant
reduction in the overall use of antibiotics or explicit positive financial effects
The effects of simvastatin and fenofibrate on malondialdehyde and reduced glutathione concentrations in the plasma, liver, and brain of normolipidaemic and hyperlipidaemic rats
The objective of study was to investigate the effects of different doses of simvastatin and fenofibrate on malondialdehyde (MDA) and reduced glutathione (GSH) in the plasma, liver, and brain tissue of male normolipidaemic and hyperlipidaemic rats. Normolipidaemic (Wistar) rats were receiving 10 or 50 mg/kg a day of simvastatin or 30 or 50 mg/kg a day of fenofibrate. Hyperlipidaemic (Zucker) rats were receiving 50 mg/kg/day of simvastatin or 30 mg/kg/day of fenofibrate. Control normolipidaemic and hyperlipidaemic rats were receiving saline. Simvastatin, fenofibrate, and saline were administered by gavage for three weeks. In normolipidaemic rats simvastatin and fenofibrate showed similar and dose-independent effects on plasma and brain MDA and GSH concentrations. Generally, plasma and brain MDA decreased, while brain GSH concentration increased. In hyperlipidaemic rats simvastatin did not affect plasma and brain MDA and GSH concentrations but significantly decreased liver GSH. Fenofibrate decreased plasma and liver MDA but increased brain MDA. In both rat strains fenofibrate significantly decreased liver GSH concentrations, most likely because fenofibrate metabolites bind to GSH. Our findings suggest that simvastatin acts as an antioxidant only in normolipidaemic rats, whereas fenofibrate acts as an antioxidant in both rat strains